Questions for LEA Leaders Regarding R277-419
by Michael Hakkarinen 1 year, 9 months agoAs the R277-419 Working Group discusses the necessary changes and updates to this code regarding Pupil Accounting, we have some questions for you!
Please take a moment to review the following request for input. You are welcome to meet and discuss with your colleagues, and then either leave comments here in the discussion thread or bring them to our PCBL Review Committee on February 16th, 2023. We will compile your responses and recommendations to share with the working group as we move forward.
- Has the removal of (a) or (b) from R277-419 impacted your LEA positively, negatively, or neither? Please explain.
- (a) 990-hour requirement
- (b) minimum school day definition
- Do you recommend (a) or (b) be added back to the rule? Please explain.
- (a) 990-hour requirement
- (b) minimum school day definition
- What data, including student outcomes, do you have to support your position?
- What recommendations do you have to the Utah State Board of Education related to the future of R277-419?
Code R277-419 Pupil Accounting is available online for your review at:
https://www.schools.utah.gov/file/0a743cdd-c72f-4ee3-8319-f5aba14bac74
Thank you for your participation!
Hello PCBL Team,
Last year, we at Spectrum received a waiver to the 180 day rule (R277-419-6) and have had a four day instructional week for this school year. Our ability to maintain this waiver depends upon the collection of required data and, most importantly, student progress. Here are my responses for the discussion.